dc.contributor.author | Oral, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Karacan, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Akpak, Y.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Şişmanoğlu, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sancaklı, Usta, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-21T08:40:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-21T08:40:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 13418076 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14871 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.yeniyuzyil.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12629/1019 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To compare the outcome of double ovarian stimulation (DOS) with follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) per started cycle in poor ovarian responders (PORs). Methods: A total of 204 PORs who underwent ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization, | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc | |
dc.title | Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research | |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2705 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2712 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 47 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jog.14871 | |
dc.relation.issue | 8 | |
dc.relation.volume | 47 | |